

The sub-5k price is the result of clashing attributes. Namely, low miles and militant adherence to originality versus one of the least desirable years for a Spitfire. Impact bumpers, low static compression ratio, and emissions hardware crippling the 1.5-liter scamp with just 50-ish horsepower. It reaches highway speeds in over 15 seconds, during which time most modern vehicles would complete a quarter mile. But its curves and 1,500-pound curb weight keep it in enthusiasts' garages... for a few years, before surrendering to rust or electrical failure. Surely 39,000 more miles in this Spitfire couldn't cause undue anguish, right?
PhiLOL actually likes the tuna here, but abhors structural rust. Save the manuals.
Ewwwww, it's got implants in front AND in the booty.
ReplyDeletePlease, someone in a state where the Geheime Smogpolizei doesn't come after you with meathooks and piano wire for anything post-1975 take this thing and clean it up.
Seems like a good deal for an honest DT-er type croc. I wish I had the space. Sure, it's had a colour change. But what other BL product can you get from a relatively dry part of the country for 4.5K?
ReplyDeleteregardless of everything else, she is still pretty.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI bought one for $4.5k in the early aughties. It was cool as with my cheeks planted I could pick up objects off the ground. It was slow, but it felt fast, since the non-boosted brakes even when working correctly were sketchy.
ReplyDeleteMine had 49k, which was believable because there were plenty of reasons not to drive it. NADA says I should have made a profit on it in the 10 years I had it, but I wound up with a small loss. In this condition, it is likely to remain a $4500 car. I always dreamed of a new engine, like from a rusted out 280z. It would have lent itself well to electric conversion too since it was light, you didn't have to go to far to match OEM power, and didn't have to worry about running power steering, brake boosters or heaters.