Thursday, November 13, 2014

10k: XKeetle: 1952 Jaguar XK120 Replica

 A Jaguar XK120 for $10k?  Get outta town.  You get maybe a front windshield or busted engine from a real XK120 for that much dough, but an original is a $150k show stopper.  The real XK120 is a gorgeous post war big bore machine with limited production quantities and unending sex appeal.  What can you get for 1/10th the price with 1/10th the appeal?  This 1952 Jaguar XK120 Replica riding on a Beetle chassis is offered for $9,500 via craigslist eBay.  Tip from Ignacio.

Oddly enough, this custom creation actually looks decent in the pictures provided -- sure it won't fool the president of your local Jaguar club, but it'll fool most passing pedestrians, until you fire up the engine.  Will the average person know the difference between an air cooled flat-4 and a Jag inline-6?

Imagine for a minute that you are pulling under the valet awning at your local country club.  The valet opens your trunk to grab your clubs and eggads!!  Commodore, alert the authorities, someone has left a Volkswagen engine in the trunk of your XK.  Shhhhh, keep it down sonny, here is a 10-spot to just park the damn car, and go easy on the shifter, its got a linkage that's a mile long. 

The interior does a good job of looking appropriately spartan for a 50s jaguar, but the gauges are too modern looking.  Better to get something with a more aeronautical look, and slightly bigger too.  See the real XK120 gauges here.

See another kit-car worth a second glance?


  1. No points for the Pantera, but I'd bet dollars to Dime Bags that KBZ can ID that crimson creature in the far port...

    1. KBZ can tell you what kind of toothpaste the owner uses. It is frightening sometimes. I try and keep him on my good side. I bet the mystery car is something from the aircooled VW world.

    2. Um...Ebay not Craig's list and it's gone!!
      Two hints and then I too bow to KBZ' superiority. In the Ebay background there is a red MB and a red Triumph. It appears as if the taillight in one picture is the British kind but the pillar in another picture looks more like the MB. Or I'm out of my mind. . .

    3. Whoops, typo on eBay vs craigslist. Fixed it.

    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Replies
    1. Dang. You beat me to it. Took too long for the Gimp to fire up.

    2. Damn, beat me to it!

  3. Re the lurking red car, it's not the MB nor the Triumph. That said, I don't know what it is...

    From Google Enhance Photo:

    ... after some sleuthing, I'm going with '72 or '73 Type 3 fastback

    On a related note, who is the wealthy madman or madwoman with this car collection???

  4. I need the old blade runner, Decker.

    What y'all can do with a pic is just...freaky. Remember when it seemed so future world cool in Ridley Scott's version, almost like the photo analysis could look around corners and eliminate shadows? Now, where is my Priss?


Commenting Commandments:
I. Thou Shalt Not write anything your mother would not appreciate reading.
II. Thou Shalt Not post as anonymous unless you are posting from mobile and have technical issues. Use name/url when posting and pick something Urazmus B Jokin, Ben Dover. Sir Edmund Hillary Clint don't matter. Just pick a nom de plume and stick with it.
III. Honor thy own links by using <a href ="http://www.linkgoeshere"> description of your link </a>
IV. Remember the formatting tricks <i>italics</i> and <b> bold </b>
V. Thou Shalt Not commit spam.
VI. To embed images: use [image src="" width="400px"/]. Limit images to no wider than 400 pixels in width. No more than one image per comment please.