Wednesday, March 26, 2014

5k: 3-Rows 5-speeds: 2006 Mazda Mazda5

The 2nd generation Mazda5 is a mini-minivan build on Ford's global C1 platform, sharing parts with the Mazda3, European Focus and Volvo S40/C30/V50/C70.  The Mazda5 combines 3-row minvan practicality with Mazda's celebrated version of zoom-zoom.  It may not carve corners like a Miata, but it is available with a 5-speed gearbox and won't lean like the average mini-barge.  Find this 2006 Mazda Mazda5 offered for $7,998 in Burnsville, MN via craigslist. Tip from Geraldine.

The Mazda5 (is it a Mazda Mazda5 or just a Mazda5?  Who named this car? Cher?) won't send any shivers up your spine with glee...but...for a 3 row car, it is about as fun as you can get without venturing into the insane (VW Bus, Military transport) or expensive gas gobblers (Ford Flex EcoBoost).

The Mazda5 is powered by the same 2.3 liter MZR inline-4 that powers the Mazda3 and is available with three pedals.  The MZR is rated at 157 horsepower and 148 ft-lbs of torque - more than enough to push the 3300 lb mini mini-van around.  The part where the brilliance of the Mazda5 falls apart is the seating.  Three rows of two seats means you only have room for six.  You can seat six in any bench seat equipped why put up with mini-van styling if  you can't seat 7 or 8 people?  The problem is that the center row collapse-able jump seat that is standard on the JDM Mazda5 (aka Premacy) does not meet some US crash tests, so it was junked.  Add that seat in and now you've got a 7 passenger car that make sense.

See a better way to haul the family around while getting your zoom-zoom on?


  1. Yep, I agree with your assessment of these cars. Fun to drive (with the 5-speed) and useful. Even fairly stylish for a minivan-ish-thingy. Oddly, the ad for this car says "Automatic", but there is no doubt it is a standard.

    These can have a serious problem with rear suspension geometry. Many of them eat rear tires like they were donuts at a police station. There are replacement arms available that include a camber adjuster. When you pull off the original arms, don't be surprised to see them stamped "FOMOCO". Much of the chassis is from the Ford Focus Wagon, which does not share the geometry problem. Go figure...

  2. When I procreate I will acquire one of these

  3. I drove this car's twin up until recently. The five speed is a slick shifting unit as you would expect from Mazda, and it corners quite well for a vanlet. Unfortunately it also shares its proclivity to rust with other Mazdas of the period, especially around the rear wheel arches. Gas mileage is unimpressive for a car this size - I averaged under 25 mpg.

    I wanted to love it, and the sliding doors were great for unloading a baby in a crowded parking lot, but the combination of poor build quality and mediocre gas mileage made me realize having a minivan was just not a necessity, even with young kids.

  4. The 2010 sport model (last year in this body style) with a 5-speed is the one to get. Stability control, TPMS, updated entertainment system and automatic climate controls along with sorted rear suspension geometry. I flew to Dallas and drove back to Colorado just to get one with a 5-speed as my daily driver and it handles well. My mileage is 25 -28.

  5. Having driven the wheels off 3 automatic variants (08' 09' 11') and one manual (13") I can attest to this vehicles greatness. Personally, I think it is the best vehicle offered in the U.S. when you take into account people carrying capacity, fuel economy, low entry price and fun to drive factors. The 5-speed manual only makes it that much better. Build quality is only mediocre but then again, it was a very affordable vehicle that delivered a solid 27mpg. That by the way is real world mileage... something calculated... not trip computer reported. Name another $20k vehicle that seats 6 and gets better fuel economy. This is what makes this vehicle so great. Eventually I needed less room as our kids got older and I downsized to what is arguably the second best vehicle.. a Honda Fit Sport. The Fit actually gets only slightly better fuel economy but is much better built.

  6. The third row is useless enough where a Mazda6 Wagon V6 Manual will do just fine in comparison, and be less labored doing so. I do like the Mazda5, but it's for an early-stage family. I'd still try to get a little extra power out of it (perhaps see if the newer 2.5L and six-speed manual can be swapped, and then mod that a little bit). The chassis seems better than the power, but a few tweaks would still be good.

    I'm not fond of the fact Mazda has the econo-car nuclear-piss-green lighting in there, either. Or that the center row seats don't have armrests on the door side (for earlier models) and that the center stack washes out in the sun because of all the silver... at least for me.

    1. Fleetwood T. BroughamMarch 27, 2014 at 1:18 PM

      I bet there's what, 4 or 5 of those V6 manual wagons in the country? They make the Legacy GT Limited manual wagons seem commonplace.

  7. I stumbled onto a used manual-trans 5 on the drive to look at a fwd manual Element. It drove like it had 90K miles on it (which it did) and was no revelation. The biggest disappointment was those 2nd-row buckets, which had large gaps around them, even when folded flat. I just wanted a smooth, flat space there for bikes and gear.


Commenting Commandments:
I. Thou Shalt Not write anything your mother would not appreciate reading.
II. Thou Shalt Not post as anonymous unless you are posting from mobile and have technical issues. Use name/url when posting and pick something Urazmus B Jokin, Ben Dover. Sir Edmund Hillary Clint don't matter. Just pick a nom de plume and stick with it.
III. Honor thy own links by using <a href ="http://www.linkgoeshere"> description of your link </a>
IV. Remember the formatting tricks <i>italics</i> and <b> bold </b>
V. Thou Shalt Not commit spam.
VI. To embed images: use [image src="" width="400px"/]. Limit images to no wider than 400 pixels in width. No more than one image per comment please.